EORTC QLQ C30 ESPAOL PDF

Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires to assess health-related quality of life in Mexican. Conclusiones: el EORTC QLQ-C30 (versión ) se ha mostrado como un Spanish. EORTC QLQ-C RESULTS: Multitrait scaling analysis showed that most. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (in all versions), and the modules which supplement it, are Requests for permission to use the EORTC QLQ-C30 or to reproduce or.

Author: Shakazragore Akinorg
Country: Russian Federation
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 28 December 2010
Pages: 78
PDF File Size: 12.40 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.20 Mb
ISBN: 663-2-56832-304-6
Downloads: 73445
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulkigami

The results are in line with previous studies.

The scores in the QLQ-C30 [ table 3 ] were in line with, and just a bit better than the ones recorded in the reference manual Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents; ; Colombia University, New York, Results Patients’ characteristics and compliance patients from a total of that were addressed filled in the first questionnaire, did the second one and answered the third one.

Patients’ characteristics and compliance patients from a total of that were addressed filled in the first questionnaire, did the second one and answered the third one. Support Care Cancer; 7: A sample of prostate cancer patients prospectively filled in the questionnaire three times: Low correlations were found between NV with PF The standard deviation of NV in the two measurements has been low, which may have affected their Alpha coefficient.

Quality of Life QL assessment plays a key role in the evaluation and treatment of cancer patients nowadays. Responsiveness to change There was a significant worsening of the condition between the first and the second measurements in five areas PF, PA, CO, DI, FAa significant improvement between the second and third measurements, with no significant differences between the first and third questionnaires.

The highest correlations were between FA and PF – 0. Most scales fulfilled the reliability criteria, except CF and NV. Interscale correlations indicated that the areas were related but represent different QL dimensions.

Acknowledgements This study has received the support of a grant from the Health Department of the Gobierno de Navarra. Data collection procedures Patients completed the QLQ-C30 on the first and last day of radiotherapy, and one month and a half after the end of this particular treatment. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that most item-scale correlation coefficients met the standards of convergent and discriminant validity.

  AZILECT PACKAGE INSERT PDF

There was also a significant improvement between the second and third measurements, and between the first and the third in SL. Validation study for Spain with head and neck cancer patients”. Group comparison analyses were satisfactory, as they were in line with the clinical data: Validation study for spanish prostate cancer patients.

Levels of compliance were high, with little missing data, indicating the d30 was well accepted.

Exceptions were items 20 and 25 in the first measurement, and wspaol, 14 and 15 in the second. New studies with other tumors could have a confirmatory value. This study has received the support of a grant from the Health Department of the Gobierno de Navarra. One of the major tasks of this group is the development of questionnaires for the assessment of QL in clinical trials.

Cronbach’s coefficients of the scales were above 0. Se han dado pocas excepciones, principalmente en la escala CF. This sample consisted of patients with localized disease T1-T3 N0 M0 who started radiotherapy with radical intention combined or not with hormotherapy at the Radiotherapeutic Oncology Department of the Hospital of Navarre.

Internal consistence reliability estimates of the QLQ-C30 scales were above the 0. This QL group has created a combined assessment system composed of a generic core questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, which evaluates issues common to different cancer sites and treatments, and a range of supplementary modules designed to assess specific issues, according to type of treatment or disease site, or to dimensions like fatigue.

The structure of this questionnaire is presented in Table I. Interscale correlation coefficients were somewhat higher in the second measurement. There was a clear tendency to eotc worsening at the end of the treatment, with a recovery in most scales in the follow-up measurement that could be due to radiotherapy low toxicity level.

  BUCHSTABIER TAFEL PDF

These interscale correlations and known group analyses were in line with f30 previous and other studies 1, Items in the CF had not a much related content, which may have influenced the multitrait and reliability analyses. Multitrait scaling analyses confirmed the eotrc structure of the questionnaire, and were in line with previous studies Item discriminant validity was successful in all analyses except in item 5 higher correlation with SF than with its own scaleitem 10 higher correlation with PF in the first measurement, and in the second assessment, item 20 higher correlations with EF and SF.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

A consecutive sample of prostate cancer patients was included. These studies are quite useful for professionals as, among other reasons, they offer an estimate of the QL values that could be expected in each country for different groups of patients, and also, because they explore if the QLQ-C30 has a good psychometric functioning when used with specific disease sites and stages.

Sociodemographic and clinical data were taken d30 the clinical records. The comparisons between the different measurements were satisfactory as they had clinical significance.

EORTC Quality of Life website | EORTC Quality of Life Group website : EORTC – Quality of Life

Few exceptions appeared mainly in CF. In SL, we could consider there has been an emotional adaptation to the disease and treatment. Multitrait scaling analysis Most items exceeded the 0. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability and validity was made. Changes in functioning and symptom areas appeared throughout the different measurements, which were in line with the treatment process.